The Real Che, El Paredon

May 6, 2007 at 2:38 pm (abercrombie, al sharpton, biden, chirac, clinton, colmes, conyers, democrap, democrat, dodd, edwards, feingold, Feinstein, franks, green, hillary, jefferson, jesse jackson, kennedy, kucinich, labor union, lampson, leahy, levin, liberal, matsui, McDermott, murtha, nagin, obama, pelosi, politics, rangel, reid, sanchez, sanders, waxman, webb)

“To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary…These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution! And a revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate. We must create the pedagogy of the The Wall! (El Paredón)” –Ernesto ‘Che’ Guevara

 

“A people without hate cannot triumph against the adversary.”

 

“Crazy with fury I will stain my rifle red while slaughtering any enemy that falls in my hands! My nostrils dilate

while savoring the acrid odor of gunpowder and blood. With the deaths of my enemies I prepare my being for

the sacred fight and join the triumphant proletariat with a bestial howl!” 

“Hatred as an element of struggle; unbending hatred for the enemy, which pushes a human being beyond his

natural limitations, making him into an effective, violent, selective, and cold-blooded killing machine. This is

what our soldiers must become … ” Che Guevara

He was very ‘brave’ when he was at la Cabaña Fortress murdering innocent            civilians, including a 14 year old child.

 

GOOD RIDDANCE!!!!!

The following is a partial list of innocent human beings executed because they were not lefties!!

14 executed by Che in the Sierra Maestra during the anti-Batista guerrilla struggle (1957-1958):

1. ARISTIDIO  2. MANUEL CAPITÁN  3. JUAN CHANG  4. “BISCO” ECHEVARRÍA  5. ECHEVARRÍA BROTHER #1

6. ECHEVARRÍA BROTHER #2  7. EUTIMIO GUERRA  8. DIONISIO LEBRIGIO  9. JUAN LEBRIGIO  10. “EL NEGRO” NÁPOLES

11. “CHICHO” OSORIO  12. ONE UNIDENTIFIED TEACHER (“EL MAESTRO)  13.-14. 2 UNIDENTIFIED PEASANTS

10 executed in Santa Clara at Che’s orders in only two days (January 1959):

1. RAMÓN ALBA  2. JOSÉ BARROSO  3. JOAQUÍN CASILLAS  4. FÉLIX CRUZ  5. ALEJANDRO GARCÍA OLAYÓN

6. HÉCTOR MIRABAL  7. J. MIRABAL  8. FÉLIX MONTANO  9. CORNELIO ROJAS  10. VILALLA

156 executed at La Cabaña Fortress prison at Che Guevara’s orders:

1. VILAU ABREU  2. HUMBERTO AGUIAR  3. GERMÁN AGUIRRE  4. PELAYO ALAYÓN  5. JOSÉ LUIS ALFARO

6. PEDRO ALFARO  7. MARIANO ALONSO  8. JOSÉ ALVARO  9. ANIELLA  10. MARIO ARES POLO

11. JOSÉ RAMÓN BACALLAO 12. CEVERINO BARRIOS  13. EUGENIO BÉCQUER  14. FRANCISCO BÉCQUER 

15. RAMÓN BISCET  16. ROBERTO CALZADILLA 17. EUFEMIO CANO  18. JUAN CAPOTE FIALLO 

19. ANTONIO CARRALERO  20. GERTRUDIS CASTELLANOS  21. JOSÉ CASTAÑO QUEVEDO  22. RAÚL CASTAÑO 

23. EUFEMIO CHALA  24. JOSÉ CHAMACE  25. JOSÉ CHAMIZO 26. RAÚL CLAUSELL  27. ÁNGEL CLAUSELL 

28. DEMETRIO CLAUSELL  29. JOSÉ CLAUSELL  30. ELOY CONTRERAS 31. ALBERTO CORBO  32. EMILIO CRUZ 

33. JUAN FELIPE CRUZ  34. ORESTES CRUZ  35. HUMBERTO CUEVAS 36. CUNY  37. ANTONIO DE BECHE 

38. MATEO DELGADO  39. ARMANDO DELGADO  40. RAMÓN DESPAIGNE 41. JOSÉ DÍAZ CABEZAS 

42. ANTONIO DUARTE  43. RAMÓN FERNÁNDEZ OJEDA  44. RUDY FERNÁNDEZ 45. FERRÁN ALFONSO 

46. SALVADOR FERRERO  47. VICTOR FIGUEREDO  48. EDUARDO FORTE 49. UGARDE GALÁN 

50. RAFAEL GARCÍA MUÑIZ  51. ADALBERTO GARCÍA  52. ALBERTO GARCÍA 53. JACINTO GARCÍA 

54. EVELIO GASPAR  55. ARMADA GIL Y DIEZ CABEZAS  56. JOSÉ GONZÁLEZ MALAGÓN 57. EVARISTO GONZÁLEZ 

58. EZEQUIEL GONZÁLEZ  59. SECUNDINO GONZÁLEZ  60. RICARDO GRAO 61. BONIFACIO GRASSO

62. RICARDO JOSÉ GRAU  63. OSCAR GUERRA  64. JULIÁN HERNÁNDEZ 65. FRANCISCO HERNÁNDEZ LEYVA 

66. ANTONIO HERNÁNDEZ  67. GERARDO HERNÁNDEZ  68. OLEGARIO HERNÁNDEZ 69. SECUNDINO HERNÁNDEZ 

70. JESÚS INSUA  71. ENRIQUE IZQUIERDO  72. OSMÍN JORRÍN  73. SILVINO JUNCO 74. ENRIQUE LA ROSA 

75. IGNACIO LASAPARLA  76. JESÚS LAZO  77. ARIEL LIMA LAGO  78. RAÚL LÓPEZ VIDAL 79. ARMANDO MAS 

80. ENERLIO MATA  81. ELPIDIO MEDEROS  82. JOSÉ MEDINAS  83. JOSÉ MESA 84. FIDEL MESQUÍA 

85. JUAN MILIÁN  86. FRANCISCO MIRABAL  87. LUIS MIRABAL  88. ERNESTO MORALES 89. PEDRO MOREJÓN 

90. DR. CARLOS MUIÑO, MD.  91. CÉSAR NECOLARDES ROJAS  92. VICTOR NECOLARDES ROJAS 93. JOSÉ NUÑEZ 

94. VITERBO O’RREILLY  95. FÉLIX OVIEDO  96. MANUEL PANEQUE  97. PEDRO PEDROSO 98. RAFAEL PEDROSO 

99. DIEGO PÉREZ CUESTA  100. JUAN PÉREZ  101. DIEGO PÉREZ CRELA  102. JOSÉ POZO 103. EMILIO PUEBLA 

104. ALFREDO PUPO  105. SECUNDINO RAMÍREZ  106. RAMÓN RAMOS  107. PABLO RAVELO 108. RUBÉN REY 

109. MARIO RISQUELME  110. FERNANDO RIVERA  111. PABLO RIVERA  112. MANUEL RODRÍGUEZ

113. MARCOS RODRÍGUEZ  114. NEMESIO RODRÍGUEZ  115. PABLO RODRÍGUEZ  116. RICARDO RODRÍGUEZ

117. JOSÉ SALDARA  118. PEDRO SANTANA  119. SERGIO SIERRA  120. JUAN SILVA  121. FAUSTO SILVA 

122. ELPIDIO SOLER 123. JESÚS SOSA BLANCO  124. RENATO SOSA  125. SERGIO SOSA  126. PEDRO SOTO 

127. OSCAR SUÁREZ  128. RAFAEL TARRAGO  129. TEODORO TELLEZ CISNEROS  130. FRANCISCO TELLEZ 

131. JOSÉ TIN  132. FRANCISCO TRAVIESO 133. LEONARDO TRUJILLO  134. TRUJILLO  135. LUPE VALDÉS BARBOSA 

136. MARCELINO VALDÉS  137. ANTONIO VALENTÍN 138. MANUEL VÁZQUEZ  139. SERGIO VÁZQUEZ  140. VERDECIA 

141. DÁMASO ZAYAS

Permalink Leave a Comment

More Democrap

May 4, 2007 at 1:06 pm (clinton, conyers, democrap, edwards, Feinstein, hillary, kucinich, liberal, matsui, McDermott, murtha, pelosi, politics, religion, sanchez, sanders, Uncategorized, waters, waxman, woolsey)

H.R. 1592,

Sec. 249. Hate crime acts

    `(a) In General-  `(1) OFFENSES INVOLVING ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN- Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin of any person–   `(A) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and  `(B) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if–      `(i) death results from the offense; or      `(ii) the offense includes kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.BUT,flying jetliners into buildings is not mentioned, murdering 32 of your classmates is not mentioned,THEN, 

    SEC. 9. SEVERABILITY.

    If any provision of this Act, an amendment made by this Act, or the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, the amendments made by this Act, and the application of the provisions of such to any person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby.But,we don’t REALLY mean it.—-

      YEAS    237 —

    Abercrombie
    Ackerman
    Allen
    Altmire
    Andrews
    Arcuri
    Baca
    Baird
    Baldwin
    Barrow
    Bean
    Becerra
    Berkley
    Berman
    Biggert
    Bishop (GA)
    Bishop (NY)
    Blumenauer
    Bono
    Boswell
    Boucher
    Boyd (FL)
    Boyda (KS)
    Brady (PA)
    Braley (IA)
    Brown, Corrine
    Butterfield
    Capps
    Capuano
    Cardoza
    Carnahan
    Carson
    Castle
    Castor
    Chandler
    Clarke
    Clay
    Cleaver
    Clyburn
    Cohen
    Conyers
    Cooper
    Costa
    Costello
    Courtney
    Crowley
    Cuellar
    Cummings
    Davis (AL)
    Davis (CA)
    Davis (IL)
    DeFazio
    DeGette
    Delahunt
    DeLauro
    Dent
    Diaz-Balart, L.
    Diaz-Balart, M.
    Dicks
    Dingell
    Doggett
    Doyle
    Edwards
    Ellison
    Emanuel
    English (PA)
    Eshoo
    Etheridge
    Farr
    Ferguson
    Filner
    Frank (MA)
    Frelinghuysen
    Gerlach
    Giffords
    Gilchrest
    Gillibrand
    Gonzalez
    Green, Al
    Green, Gene
    Grijalva
    Gutierrez
    Hall (NY)
    Hare
    Harman
    Hastings (FL)
    Herseth Sandlin
    Higgins
    Hill
    Hinchey
    Hinojosa
    Hirono
    Hodes
    Holden
    Holt
    Honda
    Hooley
    Hoyer
    Inslee
    Israel
    Jackson (IL)
    Jackson-Lee (TX)
    Jefferson
    Johnson (GA)
    Jones (OH)
    Kagen
    Kanjorski
    Kaptur
    Kennedy
    Kildee
    Kilpatrick
    Kind
    Kirk
    Klein (FL)
    Kucinich
    Kuhl (NY)
    LaHood
    Langevin
    Lantos
    Larsen (WA)
    Larson (CT)
    Lee
    Levin
    Lewis (GA)
    Lipinski
    LoBiondo
    Loebsack
    Lofgren, Zoe
    Lowey
    Lynch
    Mahoney (FL)
    Maloney (NY)
    Markey
    Marshall
    Matheson
    Matsui
    McCarthy (NY)
    McCollum (MN)
    McCrery
    McDermott
    McGovern
    McNerney
    McNulty
    Meehan
    Meek (FL)
    Meeks (NY)
    Michaud
    Miller (NC)
    Miller, George
    Mitchell
    Mollohan
    Moore (KS)
    Moore (WI)
    Moran (VA)
    Murphy (CT)
    Murphy, Patrick
    Murtha
    Nadler
    Napolitano
    Neal (MA)
    Oberstar
    Obey
    Olver
    Pallone
    Pascrell
    Pastor
    Payne
    Pelosi
    Perlmutter
    Platts
    Pomeroy
    Porter
    Price (NC)
    Pryce (OH)
    Rahall
    Rangel
    Reichert
    Reyes
    Rodriguez
    Ros-Lehtinen
    Rothman
    Roybal-Allard
    Ruppersberger
    Rush
    Ryan (OH)
    Salazar
    Sánchez, Linda T.
    Sanchez, Loretta
    Sarbanes
    Saxton
    Schakowsky
    Schiff
    Schwartz
    Scott (GA)
    Scott (VA)
    Serrano
    Sestak
    Shays
    Shea-Porter
    Sherman
    Sires
    Skelton
    Slaughter
    Smith (WA)
    Snyder
    Solis
    Space
    Spratt
    Stark
    Stupak
    Sutton
    Tauscher
    Thompson (CA)
    Thompson (MS)
    Tierney
    Towns
    Udall (CO)
    Udall (NM)
    Van Hollen
    Velázquez
    Visclosky
    Walden (OR)
    Walsh (NY)
    Walz (MN)
    Wasserman Schultz
    Waters
    Watson
    Watt
    Waxman
    Weiner
    Welch (VT)
    Wexler
    Wilson (OH)
    Woolsey
    Wu
    Wynn
    Yarmuth

    SEC. 9. SEVERABILITY.

Permalink Leave a Comment

More Insanity From The Left

May 3, 2007 at 5:34 pm (christianity, clinton, conservative, conyers, edwards, Feinstein, global jihad, hillary, islamo fascist, kucinich, liberal, matsui, McDermott, murtha, pelosi, politics, religion, sanchez, sanders, Uncategorized, war on terror, waters, waxman, woolsey)

GANESH UEIKE, secretary of the West Bastar Divisional Committee of the Communist Party of India (Maoist), seems a gentle, rather academic, man, who does not suit his green combat fatigues or clenched-fist “red salute”. He shuffles dog-eared bits of paper from a shabby file in his knapsack and writes down the questions he is asked. He answers them in slogans that he gives every appearance of believing. He wants to “liberate India from the clutches of feudalism and imperialism”.

The rare interview took place last month, in a thatched shelter in a clearing in the Bastar forest in southern Chhattisgarh. The spot was some seven hours’ walk from the nearest road, and there had been a day-and-a-half’s wait for such a “big leader” to emerge from a hideout even deeper in the jungle. His party, he said, was facing renewed suppression, because “the resources of finance capitalism are facing sluggishness in their development, and are looking for new routes,” such as the mineral riches of this forest.

Mr Ueike did not mention that, just a few hours beforehand, at the edge of the forest, in a place called Errabore, his comrades had fought back. Several hundred had mounted a co-ordinated attack on a police station, a paramilitary base and a relief camp for displaced people. They killed more than 30 of the camp’s residents, mostly by hacking them to death with axes. The scholarly Mr Ueike did boast that his army relied on “low-tech weapons”.
 

This was the latest battle in a year-long civil war in Dantewada district, in which more than 350 people have been killed, and nearly 50,000 moved into camps such as the one at Errabore. It is a remote, sparsely populated, under-developed region bordering three neighbouring states, and nine hours’ drive from Chhattisgarh’s capital, Raipur. It is here that India’s widespread Maoist rebellion is most intense.

On August 15th, in his National Day speech in Delhi, India’s prime minister, Manmohan Singh, linked Naxalism with terrorism (Islamic) as the two big threats to India’s internal security.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Dirty Dianne

May 2, 2007 at 2:45 pm (christianity, clinton, conservative, conyers, edwards, Feinstein, global jihad, hillary, islamo fascist, kucinich, liberal, matsui, McDermott, murtha, pelosi, politics, religion, sanchez, sanders, Uncategorized, war on terror, waters, waxman, woolsey)

Anyone who knows much about real power in Congress knows that almost every member of the House and Senate lusts after a seat on the Appropriations Committee and hopes one day to achieve the status of Cardinal. The Cardinals, of course, are the folks who chair the various Appropriations Committee subcommittees and literally control the billions of dollars that pass through their hands.

California Sen.  Dianne Feinstein (D) chairs the Senate Rules Committee, but she’s also a Cardinal. She is currently chairwoman of the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies subcommittee, but until last year was for six years the top Democrat on the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies (or “Milcon”) sub-committee, where she may have directed more than $1 billion to companies controlled by her husband.

She may be on the way to morphing from a respected senior Democrat into another poster child for congressional corruption.

The problems stem from her subcommittee activities from 2001 to late 2005, when she quit. During that period the public record suggests she knowingly took part in decisions that eventually put millions of dollars into her husband’s pocket — the classic conflict of interest that exploited her position and power to channel money to her husband’s companies.

In other words, it appears Sen. Feinstein was up to her ears in the same sort of shenanigans that landed California Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham (R) in the slammer. Indeed, it may be that the primary difference between the two is basically that Cunningham was a minor leaguer and a lot dumber than his state’s senior senator.

Melanie Sloan, the executive director of Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington, or CREW, usually focuses on the ethical lapses of Republicans and conservatives, but even she is appalled at the way Sen. Feinstein has abused her position. Sloan told a California reporter earlier this month that while”there are a number of members of Congress with conflicts of interest … because of the amount of money involved, Feinstein’s conflict of interest is an order of magnitude greater than those conflicts.”

And the director of the Project on Government Oversight who examined the evidence of wrongdoing assembled by California writer Peter Byrne told him that “the paper trail showing Senator Feinstein’s conflict of interest is irrefutable.”

It may be irrefutable, but she almost got away without anyone even knowing what she was up to. Her colleagues on the subcommittee, for example, had no reason even to suspect that she knew what companies might benefit from her decisions because that information is routinely withheld to avoid favoritism. What they didn’t know was that her chief legal adviser, who also happened to be a business partner of her husband’s and the vice chairman of one of the companies involved, was secretly forwarding her lists of projects and appropriation requests that were coming before the committee and in which she and her husband had an interest — information that has only come to light recently as a result of the efforts of several California investigative reporters.

This adviser insists — apparently with a straight face — that he provided the information to Feinstein’s chief of staff so that she could recuse herself in cases where there might be a conflict. He says that he assumes she did so. The public record, however, indicates that she went right ahead and fought for these same projects.

During this period the two companies, URS of San Francisco and the Perini Corporation of Framingham, Mass., were controlled by Feinstein’s husband, Richard C. Blum, and were awarded a combined total of over $1.5 billion in government business thanks in large measure to her subcommittee. That’s a lot of money even here in Washington.
Interestingly, she left the subcommittee in late 2005 at about the same time her husband sold his stake in both companies. Their combined net worth increased that year with the sale of the two companies by some 25 percent, to more than $40 million.

In spite of the blatant appearance of corruption, no major publication has picked up on the story, the Senate Ethics Committee has reportedly let her slip by, and she is now chairing the Senate Rules Committee, which puts her in charge of making sure her colleagues act ethically and avoid the sorts of conflicts of interest with which she is personally and so obviously familiar.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Response to Tenet

May 1, 2007 at 8:06 pm (christianity, clinton, conservative, conyers, edwards, global jihad, hillary, islamo fascist, kucinich, liberal, matsui, McDermott, murtha, pelosi, politics, religion, sanchez, sanders, Uncategorized, war on terror, waters, waxman, woolsey)

Why do the Iraq naysayers never confront the counterfactual scenario of their dreams? If we had left Saddam in place, the sanctions would have disintegrated in short order — Security Council members France, Russia and China were bought and paid for in Oil-for-Food bribes. Once the sanctions had collapsed, Saddam would have been right back in business — his WMD programs ready to be up and running again (to the extent they were not running already) as he sat there with about $20 billion in Oil-for-Food profits and an ongoing relationship with al Qaeda (among many other jihadist groups).If you want to say we shouldn’t have gone to Iraq, and should have anticipated the present chaos there, fair enough. But at least have the honesty to say you’d prefer the alternative: A Saddam Hussein, emboldened from having faced down the United States and its sanctions, loaded with money, arming with WMDs, and coddling jihadists.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Saddam Al Quaeda Connection

April 28, 2007 at 3:50 pm (christianity, clinton, conservative, conyers, edwards, global jihad, hillary, islamo fascist, kucinich, liberal, matsui, McDermott, murtha, pelosi, politics, religion, sanchez, sanders, Uncategorized, war on terror, waters, waxman, woolsey)

The al-Qaeda leader who is thought to have devised the plan for the July 7 suicide bombings in London and an array of terrorist plots against Britain has been captured by the Americans.

Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi, a former major in Saddam Hussein’s army, was apprehended as he tried to enter Iraq from Iran and was transferred this week to the “high-value detainee programme” at Guantanamo Bay.

Abd al-Hadi was taken into CIA custody last year, it emerged from US intelligence sources yesterday, in a move which suggests that he was interrogated for months in a “ghost prison” before being transferred to the internment camp in Cuba.

Abd al-Hadi, 45, was regarded as one of al-Qaeda’s most experienced, most intelligent and most ruthless commanders. Senior counter-terrorism sources told The Times that he was the man who, in 2003, identified Britain as the key battleground for exporting al-Qaeda’s holy war to Europe.

function pictureGalleryPopup(pubUrl,articleId) { var newWin = window.open(pubUrl+’template/2.0-0/element/pictureGalleryPopup.jsp?id=’+articleId+’&&offset=0&&sectionName=WorldIraq’,’mywindow’,’menubar=0,resizable=0,width=615,height=655′); }

Permalink Leave a Comment

Outlaw TP ?????

April 24, 2007 at 3:46 pm (christianity, clinton, conservative, conyers, edwards, global jihad, hillary, islamo fascist, kucinich, liberal, matsui, McDermott, murtha, pelosi, politics, religion, sanchez, sanders, Uncategorized, war on terror, waters, waxman, woolsey)

“I don’t want to rob any law-abiding American of his or her God-given rights, but I think we are an industrious enough people that we can make it work with only one square per restroom visit, except, of course, on those pesky occasions where 2 to 3 could be required. “…

Sheryl Crow

If you outlaw toilet paper, only outlaws will have toilet paper!!

Permalink Leave a Comment

Questioning Global Warming.

April 21, 2007 at 2:32 pm (clinton, conyers, edwards, hillary, kucinich, liberal, matsui, McDermott, murtha, pelosi, politics, sanchez, sanders, Uncategorized, waters, waxman, woolsey)

Researchers Question Validity Of A ‘Global Temperature’

Science Daily Discussions on global warming often refer to ‘global temperature.’ Yet the concept is thermodynamically as well as mathematically an impossibility, says Bjarne Andresen, a professor at The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, who has analyzed this topic in collaboration with professors Christopher Essex from University of Western Ontario and Ross McKitrick from University of Guelph, Canada.

It is generally assumed that the atmosphere and the oceans have grown warmer during the recent 50 years. The reason for this point of view is an upward trend in the curve of measurements of the so-called ‘global temperature’. This is the temperature obtained by collecting measurements of air temperatures at a large number of measuring stations around the Globe, weighing them according to the area they represent, and then calculating the yearly average according to the usual method of adding all values and dividing by the number of points.

Average without meaning

“It is impossible to talk about a single temperature for something as complicated as the climate of Earth”, Bjarne Andresen says, an an expert of thermodynamics. “A temperature can be defined only for a homogeneous system. Furthermore, the climate is not governed by a single temperature. Rather, differences of temperatures drive the processes and create the storms, sea currents, thunder, etc. which make up the climate”.

He explains that while it is possible to treat temperature statistically locally, it is meaningless to talk about a a global temperature for Earth. The Globe consists of a huge number of components which one cannot just add up and average. That would correspond to calculating the average phone number in the phone book. That is meaningless. Or talking about economics, it does make sense to compare the currency exchange rate of two countries, whereas there is no point in talking about an average ‘global exchange rate’.

If temperature decreases at one point and it increases at another, the average will remain the same as before, but it will give rise to an entirely different thermodynamics and thus a different climate. If, for example,  it is 10 degrees at one point and 40 degrees at another, the average is 25 degrees. But if instead there is 25 degrees both places, the average is still 25 degrees. These two cases would give rise to two entirely different types of climate, because in the former case one would have pressure differences and strong winds, while in the latter there would be no wind.

Many averages

A further problem with the extensive use of ‘the global temperature’ is that there are many ways of calculating average temperatures.

Example 1: Take two equally large glasses of water. The water in one glass is 0 degrees, in the other it is 100 degrees. Adding these two numbers and dividing by two yields an average temperature of 50 degrees. That is called the arithmetic average.

Example 2: Take the same two glasses of water at 0 degrees and 100 degrees, respectively. Now multiply those two numbers and take the square root, and you will arrive at an average temperature of 46 degrees. This is called the geometric average. (The calculation is done in degrees Kelvin which are then converted back to degrees Celsius.)

The difference of 4 degrees is the energy which drives all the thermodynamic processes which create storms, thunder, sea currents, etc.

Claims of disaster?

These are but two examples of ways to calculate averages. They are all equally correct, but one needs a solid physical reason to choose one above another. Depending on the averaging method used, the same set of measured data can simultaneously show an upward trend and a downward trend in average temperature. Thus claims of disaster may be a consequence of which averaging method has been used, the researchers point out.

What Bjarne Andresen and his coworkers emphasize is that physical arguments are needed to decide whether one averaging method or another is needed to calculate an average which is relevant to describe the state of Earth.

Reference: C. Essex, R. McKitrick, B. Andresen: Does a Global Temperature Exist?; J. Non-Equil. Thermod. vol. 32, p. 1-27 (2007).

Permalink Leave a Comment

Letter to a COWARD!!!

April 21, 2007 at 2:21 pm (christianity, clinton, conservative, conyers, edwards, global jihad, hillary, islamo fascist, kucinich, liberal, matsui, McDermott, murtha, pelosi, politics, religion, sanchez, sanders, Uncategorized, war on terror, waters, waxman, woolsey)

I am a former NYC Firefighter and former U.S. Marine. I have also been a Reservist in the U.S. Coast Guard for 17 years. I worked at the morgue sites going through bodies and body parts for 8 months following 9/11. As a result of the prolonged trauma of that type of work, I was disabled by the FDNY. I would like to make a statement regarding Mr. Reid’s irresponsible comments as follows:

Mr. Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader (D),

I cannot adequately explain my disappointment at the comments made by you today; “The war is lost”. It is inconceivable that someone in your position could be so irresponsible and ignorant of the fallout from those words.

With our troops overseas, on the front lines, putting themselves between your family and the terrorist extremists, you have cheered on the enemy and surely the video tape of your comments will be found at every terrorist camp and referenced by every terrorist group for the eternity of mankind. Your words have “tangibly” aided and given comfort to the enemy, in that such a high political figure in the Government of our great Country has conceded defeat to terrorism. You are a disgrace to every American, irregardless of political belief or religious background.

Your comments would have demoralized a less disciplined military. Fortunately, the military men and women on the battlefields far from home, protecting you and your families interests, are not cowards or quitters (as you are). We don’t train our military that way. Thank God you did not hold such a high office during other difficult and defining moments in the history of our country.

You have given the enemy reason to rejoice, reason to continue the fight and reason to step up their violence not just in Iraq, but all over the world. You have given the enemy “hope”. You have pointed them to light at the end of the tunnel. Congratulations.

For several years Saddam Hussein stood there ignoring U.N. resolutions, pushing his finger forward in his jacket pocket as if to say “stick-em up”. We responded to the “threat” and it turns out that we didn’t find a gun in his pocket. He was a murderer that placed no value on human life. The world is a better place without him.

On September 11, 2001, another group of people showed the world that they place no value on human life. If these terrorists had it their way, we would all be dead. Terrorists do not want to “rule” us or “enslave” us. They want to kill us. All of us. For no reason. Sound familiar? Ask a Holocaust survivor what that feels like.

Iraq could be described as decent people who have suffered under an evil regime. We are trying to help them. You have single handedly undermined that effort. You have also unwittingly caused severe damage to the Democratic party, for surely there are innumerable Democrats that have served, and do serve, in the military, and there are millions of Democrats that don’t believe in quitting or surrendering to evil. In your position as a spokesperson for Democrats, your party will suffer in 2008 for your irresponsible and ignorant comments.

For any person that believes America puts its nose where it doesn’t belong, or that we violate human rights, the litmus test for me, is when people stop trying to “kill” themselves to immigrate here. That’s when I will start questioning what kind of country I’m living in. Even after all the wars, the dropping of bombs, etc, we can’t accommodate the influx of immigration into our great Country. The “proof” stands before you. This is the greatest Country in the world and people from every walk of life and every background, race, creed, color and sex know it and want to be here in this country.

Mr. Reid, I don’t know what you were thinking. Please resign.

Sincerely,

J.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Now, Demotards Want Profiling??

April 19, 2007 at 3:55 pm (christianity, clinton, conservative, conyers, edwards, global jihad, hillary, islamo fascist, kucinich, liberal, matsui, McDermott, murtha, pelosi, politics, religion, sanchez, sanders, Uncategorized, war on terror, waters, waxman, woolsey)

Responding to the Virginia Tech massacre.

MEREDITH VIERA: Is there a profile for someone who would do something like this? 

WOLF BLITZER:  It seems like the classic profile. 

PSYCHOTHERAPIST CARYN STARK:  He’s a loner which fits the profile.

CHRIS MATTHEWS:  What do you do when you have a kid that looks like a profile who might go on a rampage?

BRIAN WILLIAMS: The classic profile of a loner that exhibited trouble, isn’t that a trend now that deserves more resources?

HELEN MORRISON:  We see the typical profile of a mass murderer!

Yet, the TSA is not allowed to profile airline passengers.

Permalink Leave a Comment

« Previous page · Next page »